
Clarence Thomas, the Supreme Court's most virulent right-wing conservative (and that says something), and the one Justice that Obama openly stated he would not have nominated because "I don't think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time for that elevation," has allowed the question of Obama's citizenship to be added to the court's docket.
Is this a little petty elbowing by the Justice Thomas for Obama's criticism?
Leo Donofrio of New Jersey filed suit against Nina Wells, the New Jersey Secretary of State, claiming that she had not performed her duty to ensure the integrity of the electoral process.Donofrio originally asked a state court to review the citizenship of Barack Obama, John McCain and Roger Calero. Calero was the Socialist Worker’s Party Presidential candidate. He was born in Venezuela. That is a cut and dry case.
...
After Donofrio’s case was rejected at the state level, he presented it to Supreme Court Justice David Souter who rejected it. Donofrio then presented it to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas who put it on the court docket for a conference on December 5. If four of the nine justices decide to hear the case, then full oral arguments will be scheduled.
Now it is possible Thomas wants to review Calero’s eligibility as a Presidential candidate. There are plenty of acceptable reasons for this. However, the timing, 10 days before the Electoral College meets, only gives hope and ammunition for those who believe Barack Obama has conspired to create the greatest hoax in world history — that he and his family have been hiding his Kenyan citizenship since he was a few days old so he could run for President.
When asked by Rick Warren at the Saddleback Church forum which Supreme Court justice he wouldn't have appointed, Obama named Clarence Thomas. He said:
"I would not have nominated Clarence Thomas. I don't think that he, I don't think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time for that elevation. Setting aside the fact that I profoundly disagree with his interpretation of a lot of the Constitution." The Democrat added that he also wouldn't have appointed Antonin Scalia, and perhaps not John Roberts, though he assured the audience that at least they were smart enough for the job.
I have a feeling Thomas doesn't take criticism lightly, although he may play it off like it doesn't bother him, such as in this 60 Minutes interview. If I were Obama, I'd be prepared for some sharp elbows from Thomas for anyone Obama tries to appoint to the Supreme Judiciary.
- Obama's Intel Picks Short On Direct Experience
- Democrats' Factions Could Stall Grand Plans
- Arianna Huffington: Obama Isn't the Only One Being Inaugurated on Jan. 20th
- CPS Consultant Peter Cunningham To Run Education Department Communications Under Duncan
- Burris To Appear Before Blagojevich Impeachment Panel Thursday
- Limbaugh claims Franken "stole" MN Senate race, cites WSJ editorial to claim "[t]hey're counting votes twice"
- Coulter: Today cancels, but CBS' Early Show to host her
- Scarborough embellished as "reporting" WSJ editorial's one-sided echo of Coleman's recount accusation
- Cunningham on the poor: "They're poor because they lack values, ethics, and morals"
- MSNBC's Brewer suggested there is "a cloud over Franken" because lawsuit or filibuster could impede efforts to seat him in Senate
Who would win in a fight?
- NBC Hailed Obamas' New School for Bringing Vegetables for the Homeless
- NBC’s Mitchell Recounts Hillary Clinton Kissing Arafat’s Wife
- Is Ann Coulter 'Banned for Life' from NBC?
- NBC Examines Plight of Israelis Terrorized by Hamas Rockets
- Bonnie Erbe Rails Against Men for Sexism in Opposing Caroline Kennedy
